Today Is Blog About Brett Kimberlin Day
I did a little googling about Kimberlin this morning and found out that today is Blog About Brett Kimberlin Day. Thus this post.
You are viewing
babydoc3's journal
I almost didn't make the poetry reading last night. I'd given three exams Wednesday and Thursday that needed grading, and final grades are due Monday.
But I am a die hard, and decided to just bring some tests with me and grade them while other people were reading. I usually don't like to do things like that. When I'm one of the readers at a poetry reading, I believe it's better etiquette to listen (or at least not be visibly occupied with other things) while others are reading. But the alternative was not going at all.
So I can't tell you much about the other readers this time. I read the following haiku:
One of the most valuable talents conservatives have is the ability to detect the bad ideas of intellectuals. Whole books by conservatives have been devoted to this.A few examples are Paul Johnson's Intellectuals, Jacques Barzun's The House Of Intellect, Thomas Sowell's Intellectuals And Society and Daniel J.Flynn's Intellectual Morons.
The problem is that someone who reads enough of the works of intellectuals to write a book about it is probably an intellectual himself. So a sweeping indictment of all intellectuals is probably not a good idea.Fortunately, most conservative intellectuals are, in addition to being intellectuals, actually smart. They know to limit the scope of their criticism.
Daniel J. Flynn, in his latest book Blue Collar Intellectuals does more than this. He demonstrates that , in spite of all the indecipherable papers and nutty ideas that come out of modern academia, the life of the mind is a good thing and intellectuals can make positive contributions. He makes this case with biographical sketches of Will&Ariel Durant, Mortimer Adler, Milton Friedman,Eric Hoffer, and Ray Bradbury, the "blue collar intellectuals" of the title. Flynn defines a blue-collar intellectual as "a thinker who hails from a working class background, and whose intellectual work targets, in part or whole, a mass audience".
I expected this book to be enlightening and wasn't disappointed. I didn't expect it to be as entertaining as it was. Will Durant's scandalous romance with the young Ariel & associations with anarchists would fit nicely in a screenplay.Many novelists would love to have written the following real life detail about Ray Bradbury
Ray graduated from high school wearing his only suit, which his uncle had been wearing when murdered by a stick-up man...It still sported the bullet hole.
Eric Hoffer's early life almost seems to come out of Dickens. Flynn does warn us that there is little corroboration for Hoffer's childhood tales beyond Hoffer himself. But aspects of his later life are more credible and just as interesting.He continuied to work as a longshoreman after writing his bestselling The True Believer.He refused an invitation to the White House because he didn't own a tie. His fish-out-of-water existence in 1960's San Francisco is also interesting. As Flynn writes
In the Star Wars bar scene that was the Bay Area in the 1960s, Eric Hoffer played the most exotic alien of all. Amidst militaristic Black Panthers,drugged-out flower children...and strident student radicals, the burly senior citizen clad in 1940 workman's clothes with closely cropped white hair bordering a bald dome elicited stares
Amidst all these colorful anecdotes a theme emerges. These blue collar intellectuals lived and worked in a time when the masses sought intellectual enrichment. The heroes of this book delivered it to them,in spite of academic resistance to "popularization". Flynn believs that the gap between the masses and the intelligentsia is wider than it has ever been. I don't think it's as wide as Flynn does, but that's a quibble. The gap exists, and we could certainly use the likes of Eric Hoffer and Mortimer Adler today to help bridge it.
I taught naked today. Not literally. I sometimes like to teach without any notes or prompts. It is a little like standing in front of the class naked if you are not prepared.
The class was data structures. I'd arrived at work, and made a last minute decision not to go up to my office to get my notes. The subject was heaps, which I have taught many times in many different classes. I was able to show an example of a heap, show how elements are added and removed, and how a heap is best represented entirely from my head.
Teaching naked only works for a few select subjects.
After class, I browsed the internet a bit before getting back to work. I found an interesting post at James Altucher's blog which contained the following tidbit:
Everyone gives the advice, “picture everyone in the audience naked.” I guess that’s supposed to make you at ease somehow. Everyone naked. Haha.
But it’s bullshit. Picturing everyone in the audience naked sounds repulsive to me. How am I supposed to speak in a room filled with naked people? ...
Instead, do this: picture YOURSELF naked. And say, “I’m sorry folks. Someone gave me the advice that I should picture all of you naked. I’d rather not offend you in that way so for the next hour you should PICTURE ME naked while I talk.” You’ll get some laughs. You can begin your talk. And, if you’re built like me, you’ll probably get a lot of phone numbers at the end.